Uso da tecnologia na reabilitação do transtorno do processamento auditivo central: uma revisão de escopo
The use of technology in the rehabilitation of central auditory processing disorder: a scoping review
Sanmara de Andrade Silva; Layze de Santana Araújo; Daviany Oliveira Lima; Marine Raquel Diniz da Rosa
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose: To present scientific evidence related to the use of technology in the rehabilitation of central auditory processing disorder.
Research strategy: The review was structured based on the international guidelines (PRISMA-ScR). PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) strategy was used to define the research question and inclusion criteria. Population: individuals with central auditory processing disorder; Concept: hearing rehabilitation program; Context: use of technology.
Selection criteria: Included studies focused on individuals diagnosed with CAPD. They addressed auditory rehabilitation through technologies, such as auditory training programs, software, or other technological tools. Only clinical and intervention between 2019 and 2025 were considered. Articles needed to be available in English, Portuguese, or Spanish.
Results: The initial search retrieved a total of 478 articles, After removing 5 duplicate articles, 473 records remained for the subsequent stage. During the selection phase, 239 records were excluded after analyzing the titles, and subsequently, 89 records were eliminated after reading the abstracts only 8 studies remained after exclusion based on the criteria.
Conclusion: Technologies are emerging as effective tools for enhancing the auditory rehabilitation process, promoting neural plasticity, and improving central auditory skills. The auditory training programs, software, and applications analyzed show positive results in most studies, demonstrating their ability to adapt to users' specific needs and promote improvement in auditory performance.
Keywords
Referências
1 ASHA: American-Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (Central) auditory processing disorders: technical report [Internet]. Rockville: ASHA; 2005 [citado em 2024 Set 12]. Disponível em:
2 Geffner D. Central auditory processing disorders: definition, description, and behaviors. In: Geffner D, Ross-Swain D, editors. Auditory processing disorders: assessment, management, and treatment. 3rd ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2019.
3 Ferre JM. Processing power: a guide to CAPD assessment and management. San Antonio: Communication Skill Builders; 1997.
4 Jerger J, Musiek F. Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11(9):467-74.
5 Geffner DS, Ross-Swain D, editors. Auditory processing disorders: assessment, management, and treatment. 3rd ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2018. p. 269-87.
6 AAA: American Academy of Audiology. Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and management of children and adults with central auditory processing disorder. Reston: AAA; 2010.
7 BSA: British Society of Audiology. Position statement and practice guidance: auditory processing disorder (APD). Seafield: BSA; 2018.
8 Musiek FE, Shinn JB, Jirsa R, Bamiou DE, Baran JA, Zaida E. GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear. 2005;26(6):608-18.
9 de Wit E, van Dijk P, Hanekamp S. Same or different: the overlap between children with auditory processing disorders and children with other developmental disorders. A systematic review. Ear Hear. 2018;39(1):1-19.
10 Musiek FE, Shinn J, Hare C. Plasticity, auditory training, and auditory processing disorders. Semin Hear. 2002;23(4):263-76.
11 Brasil PD, Schochat E. Eficácia do treinamento auditivo utilizando o software Programa de Escuta no Ruído (PER) em escolares com transtorno do processamento auditivo e baixo desempenho. CoDAS. 2018;30(5):e20170227.
12 Calarga KS, Rocha-Muniz C, Jutras B, Schochat E. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of a listening in noise auditory training software to Brazilian Portuguese. Audiol Commun Res. 2018;23:e1935.
13 Boaz AM, Biaggio EPV. Desempenho no treinamento auditivo computadorizado Performance in computerized auditory training. Audiol Commun Res. 2019;24:e1942.
14 Luís C, Abrantes A, Oliveira C, Alves M, Martins JH. Auditory Processing Intervention Program for school-aged children: development and content validation. CoDAS. 2023;35(1):e20210146.
15 Jutras B, Lafontaine L, East MP, Noël M. Listening in noise training in children with auditory processing disorder: exploring group and individual data. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Dez;41(24):2918-26.
16 Moreira HG, Brasil ALM, Malavolta VC, Brückmann M, Garcia MV. Treinamento cognitivo e auditivo acusticamente não controlado para população idosa: um estudo de caso. Audiol Commun Res. 2021;26:e2517.
17 Skarzynski PH, Czajka N, Gos E, Skarżyński H. The Stimulation of Polymodal Sensory Perception by Skarżyński (SPPS-S): comparison of stationary and remote therapy results. Finnish Journal of EHealth and EWelfare. 2023;15(1):89-95.
18 Vendruscolo V, Cruz-Santos A, Morgado JC. Cognitive auditory training: comparative impact of telerehabilitation and in-person training. Int J Psychol Neurosci. 2023;9(3):25-38.
19 Sakai TA, Guijo LM, Barbosa DAN, Delecrode CR, Cardoso ACV. Auditory abilities stimulation in preschoolers. Rev CEFAC. 2020;22(3):e0520.
20 Chermak GD, Musiek FE. Distúrbios do processamento auditivo central: novas perspectivas. San Diego: Singular Pub. Group; 1997. p. 91-107.
21 Gil D, Balen SA. Treinamento auditivo acusticamente controlado. In: Schochat E, Samelli AG, Couto CM, Teixeira AR, Durante AS, Zanchetta S, editores. Tratado de audiologia. 3. ed. Santana de Parnaíba: Manole; 2022. Capítulo 46.
Submetido em:
12/09/2024
Aceito em:
21/08/2025
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email