Audiology - Communication Research
https://www.audiolcommres.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/2317-6431-2024-2977pt
Audiology - Communication Research
Relato de caso

Efeito da TENS no fluxo salivar e voz

TENS on salivary flow and voice

Vera Beatris Martins; Carla Aparecida Cielo; Émille Dalbem Paim; Felipe de Oliveira Goulart; Fabrício Edler Macagnan

Downloads: 0
Views: 71

Resumo

A Eletroestimulação tem mostrado potencial na melhora do fluxo salivar em pacientes com câncer de cabeça e pescoço, mas seu impacto na voz pós-radioterapia ainda não é totalmente compreendido. Esta é uma série de casos, com três homens e uma mulher com média de idade de 58 anos e 2.5 meses, submetidos à quimioterapia e radioterapia para tumor de orofaringe, com queixa vocal e de hipossalivação. Todos os sujeitos foram submetidos à nasofibrolaringoscopia, registro das vozes e medida do fluxo salivar no início e no final do tratamento. Foram realizadas análises vocais perceptivo-auditiva e acústica. O objetivo foi comparar os resultados do volume de saliva e de medidas vocais antes e após a eletroestimulação. Após a intervenção, houve aumento variável no fluxo salivar em todos os pacientes, com média de 0.66 ml/min, porém, não foram observadas diferenças marcantes na avaliação perceptivo-auditiva da voz, por serem muito sutis. No entanto, foram registradas mudanças na análise vocal acústica de fonte glótica (mudanças na frequência fundamental, com aumento mais evidente, e redução em alguns parâmetros) e espectrográfica na Espectrografia de Banda Larga. Observou-se melhora, com redução da antirressonância, em baixas e altas frequências. Na Espectrografia de Banda Estreita, houve piora, com redução da definição e regularidade dos harmônicos nas frequências baixas e médias e em todo o espectrograma, e com redução do número de harmônicos nas frequências médias e em todo o espectrograma. Registrou-se melhora com redução de ruído (geral) e de sub-harmônicos em altas frequências. A eletroestimulação demonstrou induzir aumento variável no fluxo salivar com algumas melhoras vocais acústicas, enquanto a avaliação vocal perceptivo-auditiva não revelou diferenças entre os momentos pré e pós-intervenção. Apesar dos resultados promissores, estudos com amostras maiores e maior controle de variáveis intervenientes são cruciais para estabelecer uma relação causal entre a saliva induzida por eletroestimulação e a melhora da qualidade vocal em pacientes submetidos à radioterapia.

Palavras-chave

Estimulação elétrica nervosa transcutânea; Neoplasias de cabeça e pescoço; Xerostomia; Radioterapia; Voz

Abstract

Electrical stimulation has shown potential in improving salivary flow in patients with head and neck cancer, but its impact on post-radiotherapy voice is not yet fully understood. This is a case series involving three men and one woman with an average age of 58 years and 2.5 months, who underwent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for oropharyngeal tumors, presenting with vocal complaints and hyposalivation. All subjects underwent nasofibrolaryngoscopy, voice recording, and salivary flow measurement at the beginning and end of treatment. Perceptual-auditory and acoustic voice analyses were performed. The aim was to compare the results of salivary volume and vocal measures before and after electrical stimulation. After the intervention, there was a variable increase in salivary flow in all patients, with an average of 0.66 ml/min; however, no marked differences were observed in the perceptual-auditory voice evaluation, as they were very subtle. Nevertheless, changes were recorded in the acoustic analysis of glottal source (changes in fundamental frequency, with a more evident increase, and reduction in some parameters) and in the spectrographic analysis using Wide Band Spectrography. Improvement was observed, with a reduction in antiresonance at low and high frequencies. In Narrow Band Spectrography, there was a worsening, with a reduction in the definition and regularity of harmonics at low and mid frequencies and across the entire spectrogram, as well as a reduction in the number of harmonics at mid frequencies and across the entire spectrogram. Improvement was recorded with a reduction in noise (general) and sub-harmonics at high frequencies. Electrical stimulation demonstrated the ability to induce a variable increase in salivary flow with some acoustic vocal improvements, while the perceptual-auditory voice evaluation did not reveal differences between pre- and post-intervention moments. Despite the promising results, studies with larger samples and greater control of intervening variables are crucial to establish a causal relationship between saliva induced by electrical stimulation and the improvement of vocal quality in patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Keywords

Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation; Head and neck neoplasms; Xerostomia; Radiotherapy; Voice

Referências

1 Bernaola-Paredes WE, Rodrigues ML, Carvalho HP, Dos Santos Bitencourt F, Coutinho MC, D'Almeida Costa F, Vallejo-Rosero KA, Marquez-Zambrano JA, Pellizzon ACA. Reconstructive surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy for the multimodal approach in oral cancer: a single cancer centre experience. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023;85(11):5314-22. http://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000001357. PMid:37915680.

2 Aggarwal VV, Waghmare CM, Lolage SN, Pawar HJ, Ravichandran M, Bhanu A. Subjective and perceptive assessment of speech/voice and swallowing function before and after radiation therapy in patients of head-and-neck squamous cell cancer. J Cancer Res Ther. 2023;19(Suppl):S373-9. http://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_621_21. PMid:37147961.

3 Santer M, Riechelmann H, Hofauer B, Schmutzhard J, Freysinger W, Runge A, et al. Radiomic assessment of radiation-induced alterations of skeletal muscle composition in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma within the currently clinically defined optimal time window for salvage surgery: a pilot study. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(18):4650. http://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184650. PMid:37760620.

4 Costa MM, Maliska C. A new hypothesis for fluidification of vocal-fold mucus: scintigraphic study. J Voice. 2012;26(3):276-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.03.009. PMid:21705194.

5 Zou ZF, Chen W, Li W, Yuan K. Impact of vocal fold dehydration on vocal function and its treatment. Curr Med Sci. 2019;39(2):310-6. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-019-2036-0. PMid:31016527.

6 Beatris MV, Cielo CA, Santana MG, Paim ED, Barros HM. The effects of pilocarpine mouthwash on vocal quality. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci. 2018;13:30-5.

7 Radhakrishna N, Yamini BK, Kadam AS, Shivashankar N, Vishwanathan C, Javarappa R. Acoustic analysis of voice in nonlaryngeal head and neck cancer patients post chemoradiotherapy. J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13(1):113-7. http://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.199386. PMid:28508843.

8 Dalbem Paim É, Costa Batista Berbert M, Gonzales Zanella V, Beatris Martins V, Edler Macagnan F. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the salivary flow of patients with hyposalivation induced by radiotherapy in the head and neck region: a randomised clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46(12):1142-50. http://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12851. PMid:31251407.

9 Davies AN, Daniels C, Pugh R, Sharma K. A comparison of artificial saliva and pilocarpine in the management of xerostomia in patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Med. 1998;12(2):105-11. http://doi.org/10.1191/026921698670435903. PMid:9616446.

10 LeVeque FG, Montgomery M, Potter D, Zimmer MB, Rieke JW, Steiger BW, et al. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-titration study of oral pilocarpine for treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(6):1124-31. http://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1993.11.6.1124. PMid:8501499.

11 Nakagawa H, Fukuda H, Kawaida M, Shiotani A, Kanzaki J. Lubrication mechanism of the larynx during phonation: an experiment in excised canine larynges. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1998;50(4):183-94. http://doi.org/10.1159/000021460. PMid:9819480.

12 Ayache S, Ouaknine M, Dejonkere P, Prindere P, Giovanni A. Experimental study of the effects of surface mucus viscosity on the glottic cycle. J Voice. 2004;18(1):107-15. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2003.07.004. PMid:15070230.

13 Sivasankar M, Leydon C. The role of hydration in vocal fold physiology. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;18(3):171-5. http://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283393784. PMid:20386449.

14 Mercadante V, Jensen SB, Smith DK, Bohlke K, Bauman J, Brennan MT, et al. Salivary gland hypofunction and/or xerostomia induced by nonsurgical cancer therapies: ISOO/MASCC/ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(25):2825-43. http://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01208. PMid:34283635.

15 Vijayan A, Asha ML, Babu S, Chakraborty S. Prospective phase II study of the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in post-radiation patients. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014;26(12):743-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2014.09.004. PMid:25262845.

16 Conceição MD, Marocchio LS, Fagundes RL. Técnica de Sialometria para uso na prática clínica diária. Ver Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 60(5):350-54.

17 Silva AR, Cunha LO, Silva DCC, Novaes VM, Mourão AM, Vicente LCC. Efeitos imediatos da fotobiomodulação na produção de saliva. CoDAS. 2024;36(3):e20230224. PMid:38808859.

18 Tylenda CA, Ship JA, Fox PC, Baum BJ. Evaluation of submandibular salivary flow rate in different age groups. J Dent Res. 1988;67(9):1225-8. http://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670091501. PMid:3166006.

19 Ship JA, Fox PC, Baum BJ. How much saliva is enough? J Am Dent Assoc. 1991;122(3):63-9. http://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1991.0098. PMid:2019691.

20 Švec JG, Granqvist S. Tutorial and guidelines on measurement of sound pressure level in voice and speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;61(3):441-61. http://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0095. PMid:29450495.

21 Patel RR, Awan SN, Barkmeier-Kraemer J, Courey M, Deliyski D, Eadie T, et al. Recommended protocols for instrumental assessment of voice: american speech-language-hearing association expert panelto develop a protocol for instrumental assessment of vocal function. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;27(3):887-905. http://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0009. PMid:29955816.

22 Lakshman AR, Babu GS, Rao S. Evaluation of effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on salivary flow rate in radiation induced xerostomia patients: a pilot study. J Cancer Res Ther. 2015;11(1):229-33. http://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.138008. PMid:25879367.

23 Paim ÉD, Macagnan FE, Martins VB, Zanella VG, Guimarães B, Berbert MCB. Efeito agudo da Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) sobre a hipossalivação induzida pela radioterapia na região de cabeça e pescoço: um estudo preliminar. CoDAS. 2018;30(3):e20170143. http://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20182017143. PMid:29898038.

24 Beber BC, Cielo CA. Características da espectrografia de banda larga e estreita da emissão vocal de homens com laringe sem afecções. Rev CEFAC. 2012;14(2):290-7. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462012005000008.

25 Salimi F, Saavedra F, Andrews B, FitzGerald J, Winter SC. Trans-cutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to treat dry mouth (xerostomia) following radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. A systematic review. Ann Med Surg. 2021;63:102146. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.094. PMid:33664943.

26 Bastilha GR, Pagliarin KC, Cielo CA. Development and evidence of content validity of the Spectrographic Vocal Assessment Protocol (SVAP). J Voice. 2021;35(4):512-20. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.12.008. PMid:31955913.

27 Hirano M. Clinical examination of voice: disorders of human communication. Vienna: Springer Verlag; 1981.

28 Rades D, Warwas B, Gerull K, Pries R, Leichtle A, Bruchhage KL, et al. Prognostic factors for complete recovery from xerostomia after radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancers. In Vivo. 2022 Jul-Ago;36(4):1795-800. http://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.12894. PMid:35738613.

29 Alves M, Krüger E, Pillay B, van Lierde K, van der Linde J. The effect of hydration on voice quality in adults: a systematic review. J Voice. 2019;33(1):125.e13-28. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.10.001. PMid:29122414.

30 Behlau MS, Tosi O, Pontes PAL. Determinaçäo da freqüência fundamental e suas variações em altura (" jitter") e intensidade (“shimmer”), para falantes do português brasileiro. Acta AWHO. 1985;4(1):5-10.
 


Submetido em:
17/09/2024

Aceito em:
09/02/2025

69ab0456a9539537f935b3d3 acr Articles
Links & Downloads

Audiol. Commun. Res.

Share this page
Page Sections