Validação conteúdo Vivendo com Disartria
Content validation Living with Dysarthria
Lidiane Holanda; Marina Padovani; Mara Behlau; Anna Alice Almeida
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose to present the content validation of the Living with Dysarthria (LwD) questionnaire for Brazilian Portuguese.
Methods Methodological study for content validity of a speech self-assessment instrument in dysarthric individuals, in accordance with the recommendations of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (SEPT). This phase included a panel of five expert judges who assessed the relevance and theoretical and textual relevance of each item that made up the LwD. The validity of the protocol was verified by the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validation Coefficient (CVC).
Results When calculating the CVI on item relevance, six items on communication problems related to language and socialization scored below 0.59, being considered poor and excluded from the questionnaire. Still 17 items were excluded due to theoretical and textual relevance, they obtained a final CVC below 0.80.
Conclusion The LwD presents adequate validity evidence based on the test content. The final version of the instrument has 33 items, evaluated with an answer key on a six-point Likert scale. The importance of moving forward with sequential steps to obtain other evidence of validity is emphasized.
Keywords
Referências
1 Mendes AP, Moreira M, Costa A, Murtinheira A, Jorge A. Validade e sensibilidade do texto foneticamente equilibrado para o português-europeu “o sol”. Distúrb Comun. 2014;26(2):277-86.
2 Duffy JR. (2020). Motor speech disorders: substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. 4th ed. USA: Elsevier.
3 Marques TS, Furia CLB, Lira JO. Atuação fonoaudiológica na doença de Machado-Joseph: relato de caso. Audiology Commun Res. 2020;25:e2264.
4 Behlau M, Almeida AA, Amorim G, Balata P, Bastos S, Cassol M, et al.. Reduzindo o GAP entre a ciência e a clínica: lições da academia e da prática profissional – parte A: julgamento perceptivo-auditivo da qualidade vocal, análise acústica do sinal vocal e autoavaliação em voz. CoDAS. 2022;34(5):e20210240. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212021240pt.
5 Piacentini V, Zuin A, Cattaneo D, Schindler A. Reliability and validity of an instrument to measure quality of life in the dysarthric speaker. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2011;63(6):289-95.
6 Fracassi AS, Gatto AR, Weber S, Spadotto AA, Ribeiro PW, Schelp AO. Adjustment to the Portuguese and application to patients with Parkinson’s disease of protocol within central origin dysarthrias’ assessment. Rev CEFAC. 2011;13(6):1056-65.
7 AERA: American Educational Research Association. APA: American Psychological Association. NCME: National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. New York: AERA; 2014.
8 Moura ERF, Bezerra CG, Oliveira MS, Damasceno MMC. Validação de jogo educativo destinado à orientação dietética de portadores de diabetes mellitus. Revista APS. 2008;11(4):435-43.
9 Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. EIMJ. 2019;11(2):49-54.
10 Cassepp-Borges V, Balbinotti MAA, Teodoro MLM. Tradução e validação de conteúdo: Uma proposta para a adaptação de instrumentos. In: Pasquali L. Instrumentação psicológica: fundamentos e práticas. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2010. pp. 506-20.
Submetido em:
01/05/2024
Aceito em:
04/07/2024
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email