A percepção de fonoaudiólogos sobre a compreensão oral e o papel da expressividade
The perception of speech therapists regarding listening comprehension and the role of expressiveness
Daniel De Martino Ucedo; Karoline Pimentel dos Santos; Ana Carolina de Assis Moura Ghirardi; Ana Paula de Oliveira Santana
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose to analyze speech therapists’ perception of the oral comprehension process and the role of expressiveness during assessment in the speech therapy clinic.
Methods cross-sectional, analytical and qualitative study, carried out through interviews with six speech therapists working in the language area, in the state of Santa Catarina. Participants were recruited using the snowball method, forming a non-probabilistic sample. After transcribing the data, a content analysis of the participants’ statements was carried out.
Results it was verified that the oral comprehension assessment was highlighted, by the participants, as a topic which was not discussed very much in the academic training which was insufficient to prepare them for the assessment of this skill. The concept of oral comprehension was mainly related to “hearing”, “understanding” and receptivity, while expressiveness was highlighted through mention of gestures and facial expressions. In clinical practice, informal assessment proved to be the mostly used method in the assessment of oral comprehensive language, to the detriment of the exclusive use of protocols, and expressiveness was unanimously highlighted by participants as a relevant criterion in the comprehension assessment process.
Conclusion the analysis pointed out that comprehension and its relationship with expressiveness is a challenge in clinical practice. If, on the one hand, this is a less approached topic in academic training, on the other, there are few studies that propose to discuss the topic, which is reflected in the conceptual gap and reverberates in clinical practice. Therefore, studies of oral comprehensive language are emerging in the field of speech therapy.
Keywords
References
1 Reppold CT, Gurgel LG, Parise LF, Serafim A, Dias AS, Joly MCRA. Evidências de Validade de Critério da BILOv3 em Crianças Gaúchas. Psicol, Teor Pesqui. 2015;31(2):155-62.
2 Tarvainen S, Launonen K, Stolt S. Oral language comprehension interventions in school-age children and adolescents with developmental language disorder: a systematic scoping review. Autism Dev Lang Impair. 2021;6:23969415211010423.
3 Acosta-Rodríguez VM, Ramírez-Santana GM, Hernández-Expósito S. Intervention for oral language comprehension skills in preschoolers with developmental language disorder. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022;57(1):90-102. https://doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12676.
4 Sá TBF, Lima RF, Mattar TDLF, Ciasca SM. Construção de um instrumento para avaliar a compreensão da linguagem oral de crianças de 2 a 6 anos. Distúrb Comun. 2018;30(1):158-69.
5 Volóchinov V. Marxismo e filosofia da linguagem: problemas fundamentais do método sociológico na ciência da linguagem. 3. ed. São Paulo: Editora 34; 2021.
6 Trujillo JP, Holler J. Interactionally embedded gestalt principles of multimodal human communication. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023;18(5):1136-59.
7 Penteado RZ, Pechula MR. Expressividade em jornalismo: interfaces entre Comunicação, Fonoaudiologia e Educação. Intercom. Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação. 2018;41(1):153-66.
8 Holler J, Levinson SC. Multimodal language processing in human communication. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019;23(8):639-52.
9 Vinuto J. A amostragem em bola de neve na pesquisa qualitativa: um debate em aberto. Temáticas. 2014;22(44):203-20.
10 Ucedo DM. A percepção de fonoaudiólogos sobre a compreensão oral e o papel da expressividade [dissertação]. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; 2023, 86 p.
11 Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70; 1977.
12 Calignano G, Dispaldro M, Russo S, Valenza E. Attentional engagement during syllable discrimination: the role of salient prosodic cues in 6-to 8-month-old infants. Infant Behav Dev. 2021;62:101504.
13 Jakobson R. Linguística e comunicação. 24. ed. São Paulo: Cultrix; 2007.
14 Pulvermüller F. Neural reuse of action perception circuits for language, concepts and communication. Prog Neurobiol. 2018;160:1-44.
15 Çetinçelik M, Rowland CF, Snijders TM. Do the eyes have it? A systematic review on the role of eye gaze in infant language development. Front Psychol. 2021;11:589096.
16 Lima ILB, Cavalcante MCB. Ferramenta de descrição linguística Pami-Protocolo de avaliação multimodal infantil. In: Lazzarotto-Volcão C, Oliveira M, Freitas MJ. Aquisição atípica da linguagem: modelos linguísticos e práticas clínicas. Campinas: Ed. Abralin; 2022. p. 144-77.
17 Kirk E, Donnelly S, Furman R, Warmington M, Glanville J, Eggleston A. The relationship between infant pointing and language development: a meta-analytic review. Dev Rev. 2022;64:1-22.
18 Nota N, Trujillo JP, Holler J. Facial signals and social actions in multimodal face-to-face interaction. Brain Sci. 2021;11(8):1017.
19 Zorzi J, Hage SR. PROC-Protocolo de observação comportamental: avaliação de linguagem e aspectos cognitivos infantis. São José dos Campos (SP): Pulso Editorial; 2004.
20 Martone MCC. Tradução e adaptação do Verbal Behavior Milestones Assessment and Placement Program (VB-MAPP) para a língua portuguesa e a efetividade do treino de habilidades comportamentais para qualificar profissionais. [tese]. São Carlos: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos; 2017.
21 Rogers SJ, Dawson G. Intervenção precoce em crianças com autismo: modelo Denver para a promoção da linguagem, da aprendizagem e da socialização. Lisboa: Lidel – Edições Técnicas, Ltda; 2014.
22 Menezes MLN. A construção de um instrumento para avaliação do desenvolvimento da linguagem: idealização, estudo piloto para padronização e validação [tese]. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; 2003.
23 Thomson J, Gee M, Sage K, Walker T. What ‘form’ does informal assessment take? A scoping review of the informal assessment literature for aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018;53(4):659-74.
24 Ward C, Chiat S, Townend GS. A comparison of formal and informal methods for assessing language and cognition in children with Rett syndrome. Res Dev Disabil. 2021;114:103961.
25 Santana AP, Santos KP. A perspectiva enunciativo-discursiva de Bakhtin e a análise da linguagem na clínica fonoaudiológica. Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso. 2017;12:174-90.
Submitted date:
03/09/2024
Accepted date:
09/30/2024
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email