Ferramentas utilizadas na avaliação subjetiva de usuários de prótese auditiva ancorada no osso: revisão de escopo
Tools used in the subjective evaluation of bone anchored hearing aid users: scope review
Cláudia Daniele Pelanda Zampronio; Luara Rezende Madeira; Leticia Faccim Padovani; Eliane Aparecida Techi Castiquini; Wanderleia Quinhoneiro Blasca; Jerusa Roberta Massola Oliveira; Luciana Paula Maximino
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Purpose: to identify the questionnaires and scales used as subjective tools for the assessment process regarding the benefit and satisfaction of users of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids to answer the following guiding question: Which questionnaires and scales are used in adults to evaluate the benefit and satisfaction of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid users?
Research strategy: the search was carried out in the PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs and Embase databases and, in gray literature, Google Academic and Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations were used as information sources. The descriptors used were: bone-anchored prosthesis, hearing loss, mixed conductive-sensorineural, quality of life, patient satisfaction, surveys and questionnaires.
Selection criteria: studies that used questionnaires and scales to verify the benefit and satisfaction of users of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid, published in Portuguese, English or Spanish, from 1999 to 2022, were included.
Results: 176 articles were identified. Of this total, 67 were included in the scoping review. The literature indicated that the most used tools in the process of assessing benefit and satisfaction in Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid users were the Glasgow Benefit Inventory questionnaires, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit , and the Speech, Spatial, and Quality of Hearing Scale.
Conclusion: There are several instruments to be used, such as the Glasgow Benefit Inventory and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit for benefits and the exclusive Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire for the specific satisfaction of this population. As far as scales are concerned, The Speech, Spatial and Hearing Qualities Scale evaluates the benefit.
Keywords
Referências
1 Tisch M. Implantable hearing devices. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;16:Doc06. PMid:29279724.
2 Murphy KR, Han JL, Yang S, Hussaini SM, Elsamadicy AA, Parente B, et al. Prevalence of specific types of pain diagnoses in a sample of adults in the United States. Pain Physician. 2017;20(2):E257-68. PMid:28158163.
3 Schmerber S, Deguine O, Marx M, Van de Heyning P, Sterkers O, Mosnier I, et al. Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(4):1835-51.
4 Svagan M, Povalej Brzan P, Rebol J. Comparison of satisfaction between patients using percutaneous and transcutaneous bone conduction devices. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(5):651-7.
5 Ellsperman SE, Nairn EM, Stucken EZ. Review of bone conduction hearing devices. Audiology Res. 2021;11(2):207-19.
6 Snapp H. Bone Conduction: Benefits and Limitations of Surgical and Nonsurgical Devices. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2021;54(6):1205-17.
7 Lagerkvist H, Carvalho K, Holmberg M, Petersson U, Cremers C, Hultcrantz M. Ten years of experience with the Ponto bone-anchored hearing system - A systematic literature review. Clin Otolaryngol. 2020;45(5):667-80.
8 Dun CAJ, Faber HT, de Wolf MJF, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CW, Hol MKS. Evaluation of more than 1,000 devices of a percutaneous bone conduction implant: skin reactions and implant survival. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33(2):192-8.
9 Kiringoda R, Lustig LR. A meta-analysis of the complications associated with bone-anchored hearing aids. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34(5):790-4.
10 Snik AF, Mylanus EAM, Proops DW, Wolfaardt JF, Hodgetts WE, Somers T, et al. Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where are we now? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2005;195(12 suppl):2-12.
11 Reinfeldt S, Håkansson B, Taghavi H, Eeg-Olofsson M. New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review. Med Devices (Auckl). 2015;8:79-93.
12 Kruyt IJ, Monksfield P, Skarzynski PH, Green K, Runge C, Bosman A, et al. Results of a 2-year prospective multicenter study evaluating long-term audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous implant for bone conduction hearing. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41(7):901-11.
13 Hol MKS, Nelissen RC, Agterberg MJH, Cremers CWRJ, Snik AFM. Comparison between a new implantable transcutaneous bone conductor and percutaneous. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34(6):1071-5.
14 Catalani B, Sassi TSS, Bucuvic ÉC, Lourençone LFM, Alvarenga KF, Brito RV No. Prótese auditiva ancorada ao osso percutânea: benefícios auditivos. Audiol Commun Res. 2021;26:e2412.
15 Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Baldini Soares C, Khalil H, Parker D. Capítulo 11: Revisões do escopo. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. Manual do Revisor JBI [Internet]. Adelaide: JBI; 2021 [cited 2021 Aug 2]. Available from:
16 Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H, editors. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020 version). In Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis [Internet]. Adelaide: JBI; 2020 [cited 2021 Aug 2]. Available from:
17 Cowan R, Lewis AT, Hallberg C, Tong MCF, Birman CS, Ng IH, et al. Clinical performance, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of an active osseointegrated bone-conduction hearing implant system at 24-month follow-up. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Fev;281(2):683-91.
18 Hua H, Lewis AT. Job satisfaction and quality of life in adult users of bone conduction hearing devices pre-and post-implantation: a 1-year follow-up study. Int J Audiol. 2024 Fev;63(2):99-105.
19 Young A, Fechtner L, Brennan C, Rende S, Wazen J. Clinical performance, audiological outcomes, and quality of life of the Cochlear Osia ® system. Am J Otolaryngol. 2023 Set-Out;44(5):103951.
20 Nevoux J, Boulet M, Pronost N, Papon JF, Alexandru M. Performance of an active transcutaneous bone conduction implant, the Osia system, in high frequencies and hearing in noise in users converted from a Baha attract system: a prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Out 1;280(10):4691-6.
21 Portelli D, Ciodaro F, Loteta S, Alberti G, Bruno R. Audiological assessment with Matrix sentence test of percutaneous vs transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids: a pilot study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Mar 18;280(9):4065-72.
22 Rauch AK, Wesarg T, Aschendorff A, Speck I, Arndt S. Long-term data of the new transcutaneous partially implantable bone conduction hearing system Osia®. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Set;279(9):4279-88.
23 Willenborg K, Avallone E, Maier H, Lenarz T, Busch S. A new active osseointegrated implant system in patients with single-sided deafness. Audiol Neurotol. 2022;27(1):83-92.
24 Lewis AT, Gergely V. Influence of bone conduction hearing implantation on health-related quality of life for patients with chronic otitis media. J Clin Med. 2022;11(18):5449.
25 Irmer C, Volkenstein S, Dazert S, Neumann A. The bone conduction implant BONEBRIDGE increases quality of life and social life satisfaction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;279(12):5555-63.
26 Garcier M, Lavedrine A, Gagneux C, Eluecque T, Bozorg Grayeli A. Bone-anchored and closed skin bonebridge implant in adults: hearing performances and quality of life. Audiol Neurotol. 2021;26(5):310-6.
27 Billinger-Finke M, Bräcker T, Weber A, Amann E, Anderson I, Batsoulis C. Development and validation of the audio processor satisfaction questionnaire (APSQ) for hearing implant users. Int J Audiol. 2020;59(5):392-7.
28 Ordóñez-Ordóñez LE, Corredor-García GE, Vanegas SC, Angulo-Martínez ES. Resultados audiológicos y de calidad de vida en pacientes con transición del sistema BAHA Connect® a BAHA Attract®. Acta Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello. 2020;48(3):218-25.
29 Hundertpfund J, Meyer JE, Óvári A. Patient-reported long-term benefit with an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0241247.
30 Persson AC, Reinfeldt S, Håkansson B, Rigato C, Fredén Jansson KJ, Eeg-Olofsson M. Three-year follow-up with the bone conduction implant. Audiol Neurotol. 2020;25(5):263-75.
31 Pérez-Carbonell T, Pla-Gil I, Morant-Ventura A, Latorre-Monteagudo E, Pitarch-Ribas MI, Marco-Algarra J. First experiences with the Ponto™ SuperPower osseointegrated device. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2019;70(6):358-63.
32 Nevoux J, Coudert C, Boulet M, Czajka C, Tavernier L, Daval M, et al. Transcutaneous Baha Attract system: long-term outcomes of the French multicenter study. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43(6):1553-9.
33 Bosman AJ, Kruyt IJ, Mylanus EAM, Hol MKS, Snik AFM. On the evaluation of a superpower sound processor for bone-anchored hearing. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43(2):450-5.
34 Pérez-Carbonell T, Pla-Gil I, Redondo-Martínez J, Morant-Ventura A, García-Callejo FJ, Marco-Algarra J. Audiologic and subjective evaluation of Baha® Attract device. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2017;68(6):344-8.
35 Hougaard DD, Boldsen SK, Jensen AM, Hansen S, Thomassen PC. A multicenter study on objective and subjective benefits with a transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid device: first Nordic results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(8):3011-9.
36 Mclean T, Pai I, Philipatos A, Gordon M. The Sophono bone-conduction system: Surgical, audiologic, and quality-of-life outcomes. Ear Nose Throat J. 2017;96(7):E28-33.
37 Weis R, Leinung M, Baumann U, et al. Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(5):2107-15.
38 Gawęcki W, Stieler OM, Balcerowiak A, Komar D, Gibasiewicz R, Karlik M, et al. Surgical, functional and audiological evaluation of new Baha® Attract system implantations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Oct;273(10):3123-30.
39 Carr SD, Moraleda J, Baldwin A, Ray J. Bone-conduction hearing aids in an elderly population: complications and quality of life assessment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(3):567-71.
40 Ihler F, Blum J, Berger M-U, Weiss BG, Welz C, Canis M. The prediction of speech recognition in noise with a semi-implantable bone conduction hearing system by external bone conduction stimulation with headband: a prospective study. Trends Hear. 2016;20:2331216516669330.
41 Iseri M, Orhan KS, Tuncer U, Kara A, Durgut M, Guldiken Y, et al. Transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids versus percutaneous ones: multicenter comparative clinical study. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2015;36(5):849-53.
42 Busch S, Giere T, Lenarz T, Maier H. Comparison of audiologic results and patient satisfaction for two osseointegrated bone conduction devices: results of a prospective study. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(5):842-8.
43 Carr SD, Moraleda J, Procter V, Wright K, Ray J. Initial UK experience with a novel magnetic transcutaneous bone conduction device. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2015;36(8):1399-402.
44 Hill-Feltham P, Roberts SA, Gladdis R. Digital processing technology for bone-anchored hearing aids: randomized comparison of two devices in hearing aid users with mixed or conductive hearing loss. J Laryngol Otol. 2014;128(2):119-27.
45 Fan Y, Zhang Y, Wang P, Wang Z, Zhu X, Yang H, et al. The efficacy of unilateral bone-anchored hearing devices in Chinese Mandarin-speaking patients with bilateral aural atresia. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(4):357-62.
46 Ihler F, Volbers L, Blum J, Matthias C, Canis M. Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(2):211-5.
47 McNeil ML, Gulliver M, Morris DP, Makki FM, Bance M. Can audiometric results predict qualitative hearing improvements in bone-anchored hearing aid recipients? J Laryngol Otol. 2014;128(1):35-42.
48 Sprinzl G, Lenarz T, Ernst A, Hagen R, Wolf-Magele A, Mojallal H, et al. First European multicenter results with a new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant system: short-term safety and efficacy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;34(6):1076-83. http://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31828bb541. PMid:23714710.
49 Lekue A, Lassaletta L, Sánchez-Camón I, Pérez-Mora R, Gavilán J. Quality of life in patients implanted with the BAHA device depending on the aetiology. Acta Otorrinolaringológica. 2013;64(1):17-2.
50 Zeitler DM, Snapp HA, Telischi FF, Angeli SI. Bone-anchored implantation for single-sided deafness in patients with less than profound hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147(1):105-11.
51 Saroul N, Gilain L, Montalban A, Giraudet F, Avan P, Mom T. Patient satisfaction and functional results with the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA). Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2011;128(3):107-13.
52 Orús Dotú C, Santa Cruz Ruíz S, De Juan Beltrán J, Batuecas Caletrio A, Venegas Pizarro MDP, Muñoz Herrera A. Treatment of severe to profound mixed hearing loss with the BAHA Cordelle II. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2011;62(3):205-12.
53 Pfiffner F, Caversaccio MD, Kompis M. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32(5):728-35.
54 Ghossaini SN, Spitzer JB, Borik J. Use of the bone-anchored cochlear stimulator (Baha) and satisfaction among long-term users. Semin Hear. 2010;31(1):003-014.
55 Dun CAJ, de Wolf MJF, Mylanus EAM, Snik AF, Hol MKS, Cremers CWRJ. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid application in children: the Nijmegen experience from 1996 to 2008. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31(4):615-23.
56 de Wolf MJF, Shival MLC, Hol MKS, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CW, Snik AF. Cremers CWRJ, Snik AFM. Benefit and quality of life in older bone-anchored hearing aid users. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31(5):766-72.
57 Martin TP, Lowther R, Cooper H, Holder RL, Irving RM, Reid AP, et al. The bone-anchored hearing aid in the rehabilitation of single-sided deafness: experience with 58 patients. Clin Otolaryngol. 2010;35(4):284-90.
58 Ho EC, Monksfield P, Egan E, Reid A, Proops D. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid: impact on quality of life measured with the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30(7):891-6.
59 Ho EC, Monksfield P, Egan E, Reid A, Proops D. Bone-anchored hearing aid: patient satisfaction with the cordelle device. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30(6):793-9.
60 de Wolf MJF, Leijendeckers JM, Mylanus EAM, Hol MKS, Snik AFM, Cremers CWRJ. Age-related use and benefit of the bone-anchored hearing aid compact. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30(6):787-92.
61 Linstrom CJ, Silverman CA, Yu GP. Efficacy of the bone-anchored hearing aid for single-sided deafness. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(4):713-20.
62 Wazen JJ, Young DL, Farrugia MC, Chandrasekhar SS, Ghossaini SN, Borik J, et al. Successes and complications of the Baha system. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(8):1115-9.
63 Tringali S, Grayeli AB, Bouccara D, Sterkers O, Chardon S, Martin C, et al. A survey of satisfaction and use among patients fitted with a BAHA. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265(12):1461-4.
64 Kunst SJW, Hol MKS, Mylanus EAM, Leijendeckers JM, Snik AFM, Cremers CWRJ. Subjective benefit after BAHA system application in patients with congenital unilateral conductive hearing impairment. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(3):353-8.
65 Kompis M, Krebs M, Häusler R. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the bone-anchored hearing aids Baha Compact and Baha Divino. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007;127(8):829-35.
66 Sánchez-Camón I, Lassaletta L, Castro A, Gavilán J. Quality of life of patients with BAHA. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2007;58(7):316-20. PMid:17683699.
67 Badran K, Bunstone D, Arya AK, Suryanarayanan R, Mackinnon N. Patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a 14-year experience. Otol Neurotol. 2006;27(5):659-66.
68 Gillett D, Fairley JW, Chandrashaker TS, Bean A, Gonzalez J. Bone-anchored hearing aids: results of the first eight years of a program in a district general hospital, assessed by the Glasgow benefit inventory. J Laryngol Otol. 2006;120(7):537-42.
69 Hol MKS, Snik AFM, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CWRJ, Mylanus EAM. Does the bone-anchored hearing aid have a complementary effect on audiological and subjective outcomes in patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss? Audiol Neurotol. 2005;10(3):159-68.
70 Chung SM, Stephens SD. Factors influencing binaural hearing aid use. Br J Audiol. 1986;20(2):129-40.
71 Hol MKS, Snik AFM, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CWRJ. Long-term results of bone-anchored hearing aid recipients who had previously used air-conduction hearing aids. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131(4):321-5.
72 Hol MK, Bosman AJ, Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW. Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness: an evaluation of audiometric and patient outcome measurements. Otol Neurotol. 2005 Set;26(5):999-1006.
73 Hol MKS, Spath MA, Krabbe PFM, van der Pouw CT, Snik AF, Cremers CW, et al. The bone-anchored hearing aid: quality-of-life assessment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(4):394-9.
74 Hol MKS, Bosman AJ, Snik AFM, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CWRJ. Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness: a study of 20 patients. Audiol Neurotol. 2004;9(5):274-81.
75 McLarnon CM, Davison T, Johnson IJ. Bone-anchored hearing aid: comparison of benefit by patient subgroups. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(5):942-4.
76 Bosman AJ, Hol MKS, Snik AFM, Mylanus EAM, Cremers CWRJ. Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness. Acta Otolaryngol. 2003;123(2):258-60.
77 Niparko JK, Cox KM, Lustig LR. Comparison of the bone-anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness. Otol Neurotol. 2003;24(1):73-8.
78 McDermott AL, Dutt SN, Tziambazis E, Reid AP, Proops DW. Disability, handicap and benefit analysis with the bone-anchored hearing aid: The Glasgow hearing aid benefit and difference profiles. J Laryngol Otol. 2002;(28):29-36.
79 McDermott AL, Dutt SN, Reid AP, Proops DW. An intra-individual comparison of the previous conventional hearing aid with the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Nijmegen group questionnaire. J Laryngol Otol Suppl. 2002;116(28):15-9.
80 Arunachalam PS, Kilby D, Meikle D, Davison T, Johnson IJ. Bone-anchored hearing aid quality of life assessed by Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(7):1260-3.
81 van der Pouw CT, Snik AFM, Cremers CWRJ. The BAHA HC200/300 in comparison with conventional bone conduction hearing aids. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1999;24(3):171-6.
82 Mylanus EAM, Snik AFM, Jorritsma FF, Cremers CWR, Verschuure, H. Audiological results of the bone anchored hearing aid HC199: multicentre results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1992;101(4):257-63.
83 Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG. Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996;105(6):415-22.
84 Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear. 1995;16(2):176-86.
85 Gatehouse S. Glasgow hearing aid benefit profile: derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services. J Am Acad Audiol. 1999 Fev;10(02):80-103.
86 Cox RM, Alexander GC. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol. 2002;41(1):30-5.
87 Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G. The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Out 16;1(1):54.
88 Gatehouse S, Noble W. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol. 2004;43(2):85-99.
89 Mylanus EAM, Hua H, Wigren S, Arndt S, Skarzynski PH, Telian SA, et al. Multicenter clinical investigation of a new active osseointegrated steady-state implant system. Otol Neurotol. 2020 Out 1;41(9):1249-57.
90 Hua H, Lewis AT. Job satisfaction and quality of life in adult users of bone conduction hearing devices pre-and post-implantation: a 1-year follow-up study. Int J Audiol. 2024;63(2):99-105.
91 Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear. 1999;20(4):306-20.
92 Grutters JP, Joore MA, van der Horst F, Verschuure H, Dreschler WA, Anteunis LJ. Choosing between measures: comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(8):1439-49.
93 Dutt SN, McDermott AL, Jelbert A, Reid AP, Proops DW. Day to day use and service-related issues with the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Entific Medical Systems questionnaire. J Laryngol Otol. 2002;116(Suppl 28):20-8.
Submetido em:
14/02/2024
Aceito em:
04/07/2024
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email